USPTO Clarifies Treatment of AI is a Tool in Innovation Instead of a Competing Inventor

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released today its Revised Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Docket No. PTO-P-2025-0014), replacing its 2024 guidance. The USPTO explicitly affirms that “AI systems, including generative AI and other computational models, are instruments used by human inventors. They are analogous to laboratory equipment, computer software, research databases, or any other tool that assists in the inventive process” (emphasis added). This recognition properly aligns patent practice with today’s innovation environment and the reality of AI itself: sets of algorithms operating on large datasets that serve as a (usually!) helpful tool in the hands of human creativity rather than an independent inventor.

While this guidance provides valuable clarity for applicants and examiners, it does not bind the courts. Judicial interpretation of inventorship—particularly in disputes involving AI-assisted conception—may develop differently as fact patterns test the limits of existing precedent. Courts could scrutinize the degree of human contribution and the evidentiary record supporting conception, creating potential divergence from USPTO practice. Entrepreneurs and investors should therefore treat the USPTO’s position as a strong administrative baseline, but not the final word on enforceability or ownership outcomes.

Actionable Insight for Technology Entrepreneurs:
This new guidance helps to significantly reduce the concern of inventors when properly using AI tools as part of the inventive process, and properly recognizes that AI is a data processing machine, not a competing ‘thinker’. The new guidance rightly underscores the importance of conception of the invention — which reinforces the importance that documentation may take on, showing how human inventors conceived an idea and then directed AI-assisted outputs during the inventive process. Records of your conception and involvement can not only support compliance with USPTO standards, but may also help position patent rights to withstand judicial review and investor due diligence.

For strategic insight on protecting and monetizing AI-assisted innovations under this changing legal landscape, contact Definitive Patents — a member firm of Synchrony IP.

Timothy Snowden, CPP CLP Principle Agent

See Full Bio